Those whose arguments are empty of fact are usually full of shit. --David Porter
Get it out there. Call, write, talk, inform.

Wednesday, June 27, 2007

A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Words







Sad Little Girl

It would be nice if the press would stop giving Ann Coulter a soap box from which she can spew her hate. Only people with legitimate opinions should be given air time by the press.

Ann Coulter certainly does have opinions, but they are not legitimate ones:
"So I've learned my lesson. If I'm going to say anything about John Edwards in the future,I'll just wish he had been killed in a terrorist assassination plot."
And "But Al Gore -- total fag."
And "John Edwards has a bumper sticker on the back of his car that says, 'ask me about my dead son.'"

Yes, I am all for free speech, but as everyone knows, there are limits to free speech. The things that Ann Coulter says are not anything more pithy or intelligent than a 12 year old boy would say.

The press must stop covering her, stop giving her a platform. She is not newsworthy.

Those whose arguments are empty of fact, are generally full of shit.™

Friday, June 22, 2007

"VP's office is not a part of the executive branch"--- VP Cheney

The Information Security Oversight Office asked Cheney's office to give it classified documents so that the calssified documents could be stored securely. Cheney's office said no. Cheney believes that the vice president's office is NOT an executive branch agency. If this is true, if the VP's office is not an executive branch agency, then by law the VP's office is not allowed to see classified documents and better yet, Cheney and his staff cannot claim executive privilege!

In a July 25th 2001 interview on Nightline Cheney used executive privilege to shield himself and the president against his energy task force. Now he claims that he doesn't have to follow a presidential order because he's not part of the executive branch. Somebody teach him a lesson!

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Vice President Dick Cheney's office refused to cooperate with an agency that oversees classified documents, then tried to abolish the office when it challenged the actions, House oversight committee Chairman Henry Waxman said.
The National Archives' Information Security Oversight Office is charged by presidential order with ensuring that classified information and documents are properly handled by executive branch agencies.
According to a letter from William Leonard, director of the oversight office, Cheney's office argued it did not meet the definition of an executive branch agency and therefore was exempt.
Leonard also wrote that Cheney's office suggested his agency be abolished under a revision of the presidential order now under consideration. (Watch how Cheney's office defines its role )
"I question both the legality and wisdom of your actions," Waxman, D-California, wrote in a letter Thursday to Cheney.
"Your decision to exempt your office from the president's order is problematic because it could place national security at risk," wrote Waxman, chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.
Cheney's office would neither confirm nor deny it tried to abolish the Information Security Oversight Office.
"We are confident that we are conducting the office properly under the law," said Megan McGinn, deputy press secretary for Cheney, when asked about the Waxman letter.
The executive order -- intended to maintain the integrity of classified documents -- was established by President Clinton and revised by President Bush in 2003.
The 2003 version directed the Information Security Oversight Office to oversee a program of education and supervision of classified document protection and maintenance. According to Waxman, the office has worked with different White House groups, including the National Security Council.
But when the National Archives' office attempted to visit Cheney's team in 2004, it was prevented from doing so by Cheney's staff, Waxman wrote in the letter. The office had complied with the order in 2001 and 2002 but started refusing to do so in 2003.
In 2006, Leonard wrote to Cheney's chief of staff, David Addington, to contest the office's refusal to comply and was told that the vice president's office "does not believe it is included in the definition of 'agency' as set forth in the order," nor is it an "entity within the executive branch that comes into the possession of classified information," according to letters released Thursday by Waxman's committee.
In a letter to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales requesting intervention on the matter, Leonard questioned the rationale presented by the vice president's office.
"If the [office of the vice president] is not considered an entity within the executive branch, I am concerned that it could impede access to classified information by the OVP staff, in that such access would be considered a disclosure outside the executive branch," Leonard wrote in January.
Justice Department spokesman Erik Ablin said the department had received the letter and that matter is under review.
The vice president's office has been criticized for being secretive before.
Last month, it was revealed that the administration was withholding visitor logs to Cheney's residence. The administration says the secrecy is needed so Cheney can get candid advice from visitors.
In 2001, the office refused to divulge the names of energy executives who had consulted with Cheney on U.S. energy policy.
The decision was challenged and upheld by the courts. The U.S. Supreme Court referred the case back to a lower court.
CNN's Adam Levine and Suzanne Malveaux contributed to this report

Those whose arguments are empty of fact, are generally full of shit.™