Those whose arguments are empty of fact are usually full of shit. --David Porter
Get it out there. Call, write, talk, inform.

Thursday, September 28, 2006

You can lead an ass to...

You know, I can understand why the Party of Ignorance doesn't always believe the Democrats when we bring up what the Bush Administration has done (or not done). They fear our "bias" and rhetoric, sure. But when we actually produce documents and witnesses from within the machinery, it absolutely amazes me that we are still not believed.

How, when confronted with irrefutable, hard, documented evidence, does this Administration continue to make it look like we are all conspiracy-theory, tin-foil hat wearing, chicken little, nut jobs?

Anyway, the above ranting is an introduction to one more piece of evidence that chronicles Bush's amazing power to deflect the truth.

Christiane Amanpour interviewed Gary Bernsten on CNN. Who is Gary? Some liberal, terrorist-loving, America hating commie?

No, Gary is good ol' CIA. In fact, Gary led the CIA's paramilitary unit chasing bin Laden after he fled from Kabul. And Gary has some interesting FACTS that are very interesting in light of the recent dust-up about who did what and when to capture Al Qaeda and Bin Laden.

According to Gary (the CIA Gary, not the Liberal commie one) it seems that
CIA officials asked Washington (aka BUSH) not once, but twice to send reinforcements when bin Laden was cornered in Afghanistan in 2001.
But you know how big govt bureaucracies can be, you know--slow to act.

Well, the good news is that Bush's big govt bureaucracy was not slow to act.
Bush's big govt bureaucracy acted fast. At DECLINING the CIA request to send reinforcements to capture Bin Laden in 2001. Bush's bureaucracy actually acted so fast, that the CIA didn’t catch it the first time and requested AGAIN that Bush send reinforcements to capture Bin Laden. But, as everyone knows, the Bush Administration, once it made a decision, does not backtrack. So the Bush Administration declined to send reinforcements to capture Bin Laden a second time.

By the time of the second request by the CIA for troops, the special ops force could hear Osama on radio asking his followers for forgiveness for leading them to their imminent capture. IT WAS THAT CLOSE.

AMANPOUR: ... the CIA was sure it knew where he was, thanks in large part to a radio taken off a dead al Qaeda fighter.
BERNTSEN: We listened to bin Laden for several days using that radio, listened to his communications among him and his men. We listened to him apologize to them for having led them into this trap and having led them into a location where they would be having airstrikes called on them just relentlessly." . . . .

BERNTSEN: In the first two or three days of December, I would write a message back to Washington, recommending the insertion of U.S. forces on the ground. I was looking for 600 to 800 Rangers, roughly a battalion. They never came.
BERGEN: By my calculation, there were more American journalists than American soldiers at the battle of Tora Bora, and that fact kind of speaks for itself.

Bernsten's urgent message followed a direct briefing on troop needs and a request, in-person to President Bush in November by Henry "Hank" Crumpton, who was then CIA officer in D.C. heading the Afghanistan effort.

Crumpton strongly urged Bush to send more troops. But Bush reportedly said Pakistan's President Pervez Musharraf promised that his troops would seal all escapes into north Pakistan. Crumpton explained to Bush that Pakistani troops couldn't control that tribal region and satellite photos showed Pakistan's troops weren't there and wouldn't arrive in time.

"'We're going to lose our prey if we're not careful,' Crumpton reportedly warned the president." But this time Bush asked if the Afghani forces could do the job. 'Definitely not, Mr. President,' said Crumpton. 'Definitely not.'"

Wednesday, September 27, 2006

Condi Lies (again) about "No terror alarm from Clinton"

Rice again lied that the Clinton Administration Did Not Leave A ‘Strategy To Fight Al Qaeda’

In her interview with the New York Post, Condi claims that the Clinton Administration did not develop a strategy to fight al Qaeda. The lying bitch also sharply disputed Clinton’s claim that he “left a comprehensive anti-terror strategy” for the incoming Bush team during the presidential transition in 2001.

Here’s what the 9/11 Commission Report has to say about it:
As the Clinton administration drew to a close, Clarke and his staff developed a policy paper of their own [which] incorporated the CIA’s new ideas from the Blue Sky memo, and posed several near-term policy options. Clarke and his staff proposed a goal to “roll back” al Qaeda over a period of three to five years …[including] covert aid to the Northern Alliance, covert aid to Uzbekistan, and renewed Predator flights in March 2001. A sentence called for military action to destroy al Qaeda command-and control targets and infrastructure and Taliban military and command assets. The paper also expressed concern about the presence of al Qaeda operatives in the United States.” [p. 197]

Clarke, who also worked for the Regan and Bush administrations, wrote to that lying bitch, Condi, a memo as soon as the Bush administration took office, stating, “[W]e urgently need…a Principals level review of the al Qida network.” His request was denied.

Would you like to see the actual Memo that that lying bitch, Condi, says doesn't exist? You can see, with your own eyes, the actual Memo.

And here is the actual strategy Memo titled Strategy for Eliminating the Threat from the Jihadist Networks of al-Qida: Status and Prospects developed by the last Administration that that lying bitch Condi said she did not receive.

Wow, so I guess Condi was right. The Clinton Administration didn’t give her an Al Qaeda strategy. They gave the lying bitch TWO strategies.