Condi Lies (again) about "No terror alarm from Clinton"
Rice again lied that the Clinton Administration Did Not Leave A ‘Strategy To Fight Al Qaeda’
In her interview with the New York Post, Condi claims that the Clinton Administration did not develop a strategy to fight al Qaeda. The lying bitch also sharply disputed Clinton’s claim that he “left a comprehensive anti-terror strategy” for the incoming Bush team during the presidential transition in 2001.
Here’s what the 9/11 Commission Report has to say about it:
As the Clinton administration drew to a close, Clarke and his staff developed a policy paper of their own [which] incorporated the CIA’s new ideas from the Blue Sky memo, and posed several near-term policy options. Clarke and his staff proposed a goal to “roll back” al Qaeda over a period of three to five years …[including] covert aid to the Northern Alliance, covert aid to Uzbekistan, and renewed Predator flights in March 2001. A sentence called for military action to destroy al Qaeda command-and control targets and infrastructure and Taliban military and command assets. The paper also expressed concern about the presence of al Qaeda operatives in the United States.” [p. 197]
Clarke, who also worked for the Regan and Bush administrations, wrote to that lying bitch, Condi, a memo as soon as the Bush administration took office, stating, “[W]e urgently need…a Principals level review of the al Qida network.” His request was denied.
Would you like to see the actual Memo that that lying bitch, Condi, says doesn't exist? You can see, with your own eyes, the actual Memo.
And here is the actual strategy Memo titled Strategy for Eliminating the Threat from the Jihadist Networks of al-Qida: Status and Prospects developed by the last Administration that that lying bitch Condi said she did not receive.
Wow, so I guess Condi was right. The Clinton Administration didn’t give her an Al Qaeda strategy. They gave the lying bitch TWO strategies.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home